Is it ok to call any form of agile prescriptive?
Definition: Prescriptive - giving exact rules, directions or instructions about how you should do something - from Merriam-Webster dictionary
Scrum lays out a specific set roles, events, artifacts and rules that bind them together. The Scrum Guide is only 16 pages, as compared to some other approaches. I know, I know:
- We do Scrum, but we don't find much use in having a retrospective...
- We do Scrum, but we don't meet daily instead we meet on Tuesday and Thursday.
- We do Scrum, but...
You can find the full description in the The Scrum Guide.
If you are doing Scrum and not some variation of Scrum, but, then you know there are set of specifics that are part of Scrum. If you're not doing the basics you're doing "Scrum, but."
The problem I've had using the term "prescriptive" is people forget the second part of the statement - they remember prescriptive and forget the "start" part. A prescriptive start is exactly what is needed and Scrum gives you the keys to getting started. There are specifics that make Scrum, Scrum. However, Scrum is a framework that allows for much variation in many of the practices used within the framework.
If you've read the The Scrum Guide you know that Scrum is a lightweight framework that is applied to complex adaptive projects using the empirical process. From the Scrum Guide, it's:
- Lightweight
- Simple to Understand
- Difficult to master
Disciplined teams are consistent, reliable, trustworthy, knowledgeable, ... In the case of Scrum teams, the best adhere to the Scrum Framework, augmenting the framework with things like: user stories, TDD, Continuous Integration, ...
That's where we all want to be. You have to start with something simple, master it and augment, adapting as you go
Hope you enjoyed this rant.
No comments:
Post a Comment